How does acculturation to the liberal ideology influence us?

By: RIPS - IRSP Blog on 5:53 AM

Liberalism promotes uniqueness, initiative, critical thinking and personal achievements. The American dream – being a ‘self-made (wo)man’ – is an incarnation of such values, that encourages the belief that people can succeed through hard work and self-determination.

Obviously, television shows and movies perpetuate liberal values. The Apple advertising campaign from two decades ago, “Think Different”, is a good window into the liberal culture. Even the logo of the brand, a bitten apple, symbolizes that going against rules and standards generates imagination and creativity. French advertisements are also an important vector for the spread of liberal values, such as the Citroën DS3 add (2013, “step out of line”), or the Lancôme add (2012, “In a world full of diktats and convention, couldthere be another way?”).

Source: shutterstock

How acculturation to the liberal ideology influences us? To examine this question, Codou, Priolo, Camus, Schadron, Morchain, and Denis-Remis designed an experiment, published in the IRSP in 2012, to test the effect of liberal priming on the tendency to attribute behavior to internal causes (e.g., personal factors: traits, abilities, or personality) rather than external causes (e.g., situational factors, luck).

Acculturation to liberal ideology and internality

Participants were asked to examine and evaluate various advertising messages. They received a booklet containing either 15 advertisements that used liberal values as sales argument (e.g., “Think different” Apple, “Your perfume, your rules of the game” Hugo Boss etc.), either 15 advertisements using sales arguments that did not refer directly to liberal values (e.g., “Buffalo hide at an exceptional price”). Then, participants were asked to participate in a supposed different study by answering a questionnaire, which was actually the individualistic-pattern questionnaire or QEPI (Questionnaire d’Etude du Pattern Individualiste) proposed by Dubois and Beauvois in 2005. This questionnaire was developed to measure individuals’ attitude toward individualism, and more specifically internality (vs. externality), self-sufficiency (vs. hetero-sufficiency) and individual (vs. categorical) anchoring. 

Source: shutterstock

Each item described a hypothetical event followed by two possible explanations of the event, between which the participants had to choose. Some items attributed a behavior to an internal cause (e.g., “often, people who have bad things happen to them get what they deserve”), or to an external cause (e.g., “are not responsible for their misfortune”), accentuated one’s ability to find ways within oneself to satisfy personal needs or desires (e.g., “to get ahead in life, you have to know that the only person you can count on is yourself”) or accentuated others’ ability to do so (e.g., “you have to know how to knock on the right doors”), and proposed to define oneself in terms of one’s own tastes, attitudes, and behaviors (e.g., “one can like the same art productions at all age”) or in category memberships (e.g., “often, the art productions we like change with age”).

Compared to neutral priming, liberal priming is more likely to facilitate the adoption of individualistic responses. Indeed, when the authors used advertising messages to prime liberal values such as independence, uniqueness, interindividual differences and freedom, participants chose more often sentences with a focus on internality and individual anchoring than the participants primed using a “neutral” material. Thus, this research highlights the relationship between liberal values and individualistic orientations.

Media, culture and society

Media and advertising reflects cultural orientations of our societies (and particularly, the individualistic vs. collectivist dimension ; Hofstede, 1980), and appear to play a strong role in promoting such values at the same time. In a collectivist culture, advertising is more inclined to emphasize the social context, success and harmony in social relations (e.g., Chinese advertising for the Audi Q3, 2013). In such context, an advertisement focusing on the product’s ability to differentiate the individual or the affirmation of individuality may turn out counterproductive: instead of being rejected, similarity is celebrated for the links it created, reinforces or reveals between individuals (e.g., Chinese advertising for an insurance brand).

References 

Codou, O., Priolo, D., Camus, O., Schadron, G., Morchain, P., & Denis-Remis, C. (2012). Ideological priming and normative dimensions of individualism. International Review of Social Psychology / Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 25(2), 59-71.

Dubois, N., & Beauvois, J. L. (2005). Normativeness and individualism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 123-146.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.


---